#Orion skyscanner 100 reflector full

Best Choice Beginner Telescopes Under $100 Meade Instruments-Infinity 70mm Aperture – Best Beginner Telescope For The Money Image credit: Meade Instruments That’s why we’ve put together the 7 best beginner telescopes for under $100 to give you a better idea of the quality telescope kit you can get for under that amount. If you learn the constellations and study detailed sky maps, you have some great stargazing that will keep you happy and busy for years. Even the best telescopes for viewing galaxies will not work for you if you don’t know where they are in the sky.Īstronomy is not simply looking in the night sky. But we have to tell you this, it’s not always the telescope’s fault. This puts many people off even getting started for fear of wasting their money on a telescope that just doesn’t cut it. Telescopes can be very expensive when you don’t have a great deal of knowledge about them, and it’s difficult to know which one is the best one for your budget.

Orion SpaceProbe II 76mm Equatorial Reflector Telescope Kit.

Orion 10012 SkyScanner 100mm TableTop Reflector Telescope.

Gskyer Telescope 70mm Aperture Refracting Telescope.

Meade Instruments-Infinity 80mm Aperture.

Meade Instruments-Infinity 70mm Aperture.

Stars with about 11.5 to 12 stellar magnitude.

Planet Saturn’s and about 4-5 of Saturn’s moons.

No-one expects NASA quality moon pictures from a telescope under $100 with a 70mm telescope, so what can you see for your money? What Can You See on a Clear Night with Best Telescopes Under 100$ If your first choice is a disaster, then it may even put you off astronomy for life. There are thousands of different telescopes to choose from. Not sure if the 4mm eyepiece that comes with the Firstscope (giving a magnification of 75X) is very useful - I've heard many complaints about it (images too dark because of the high power, field of view too small).Most newcomers to astronomy want to know the best beginner telescopes for under $100 because buying a telescope is no simple task. It gives magnifications of 20X and 40X on the Skyscanner (15X & 30X on the Funscope) to provide nice wide field views. The Orion Funscope also comes with a red dot finder.Ĥ) Has a thread to attach a photo tripod at the bottom of the base (the Orion Funscope has this as well).ĥ) The eyepieces supplied with the Skyscanner - 20mm & 10 mm - work very well (both sizes also come with the Funscope). Otherwise, one probably has to use the lowest power eyepiece to search for objects. This results in MUCH less distortion of stars away from the center of the field of view with the Skyscanner, resulting in more pleasing starry views.Ģ) The additional 24 mm of aperture allows you among other things, to begin resolving the brighter globular clusters (especially with darker skies), which you can't do with these 76 mm scopes.ģ) Comes with a red dot finder (works great in targeting objects) - the Firstcope has no finderscope (unless you buy the accessory kit that comes with a 5x24 finder). Here are my comparisons:ġ) The Funscope/Firstscope uses a spherical mirror, while the Skyscanner uses a parabolic mirror. Richard - besides the Skyscanner, I own the Orion 76mm Funscope, which is practically identical to the Firstscope in the tube, mount and mirrors (made by the same factory?) and has the same retail price of $49.95 (however, it also differs in some other important ways).

But if you have $200 and don't mind a somewhat heavier and bulkier telescope, you'd definitely do better with the StarBlast, which is a timeless classic.

It's a fine scope despite its limitations, and it won't disappoint you. What's the moral? If you want the most aperture possible for $100, or if you want an ultraportable scope that can be attached to a standard photo tripod, by all means buy the SkyScanner.

#Orion skyscanner 100 reflector full

The SkyScanner gathers fully 2.7 times as much light as a 60-mm refractor, making every star and deep-sky object appear a full magnitude brighter. The refractor probably does a better job on the planets, but that's the end of its advantages. So in practice, the StarBlast requires either a sturdy table or some kind of custom-built support.īut now let's forget about the StarBlast, and compare the SkyScanner instead to a standard commercial 60-mm refractor selling for exactly the same price. The StarBlast isn't threaded for photo tripods, and even if it were, it would be too heavy for all but the most robust (and expensive) professional-caliber tripods. On the flip side, the SkyScanner can be attached to any standard photo tripod with a detachable head - a very convenient arrangement. The Orion SkyScanner is shown here attached to a set of Bogen Manfrotto 3011 photo-tripod legs - a very solid and convenient arrangement.